Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Klaas Katerstraat 102
Apartment at Klaas Katerstraat 102 in Amsterdam (Zuidwestkwadrant-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 2003 and has 78 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Heemstedestraat (2.6 km). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool De Odyssee (241 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer17 Jul 2026
- Relisted12 Jun 2026€ 350,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 78 m²
- Construction year
- 2003
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 419,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zuidwestkwadrant-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside43.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.6%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.6 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated215 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,403 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)110 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.771 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 425 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 422 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
64th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
44th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 352 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 333 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
34th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 38 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.