Price drops in and around Cuijk
More homes in and around Cuijk whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17/07/2026 | Franssenstraat 144 Vianen (NB) | € 615.000 € 595.000 | -3.3% | 126 m²400 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Gagelveld 19 Milsbeek | € 850.000 € 799.000 | -6.0% | 259 m²1255 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Everdrift 17 Cuijk | € 649.000 € 629.000 | -3.1% | 193 m²431 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Woeziksestraat 615 Wijchen | € 425.000 € 395.000 | -7.1% | 1130 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Kling 54 Cuijk | € 399.000 € 379.000 | -5.0% | 77 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | 't Slotje 59 Wijchen | € 395.000 € 365.000 | -7.6% | 78 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Treubstraat 96 Nijmegen | € 450.000 € 419.000 | -6.9% | 84 m²245 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Oude Kleefsebaan 225 e Berg en Dal | € 280.000 € 250.000 | -10.7% | 93 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Kronenland 1231 Wijchen | € 450.000 € 435.000 | -3.3% | 124 m²141 m² | |||
07/07/2026 | Zwanenveld 2702 Nijmegen | € 359.000 € 315.000 | -12.3% | 86 m²155 m² | |||
06/07/2026 | De Messemaker 43 Cuijk | € 1.049.000 € 995.000 | -5.2% | 184 m²925 m² | |||
06/07/2026 | de Chamillylaan 4 Grave | € 420.000 € 395.000 | -6.0% | 117 m²143 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Jutta van Nassaulaan 8 Cuijk | € 1.139.000 € 1.050.000 | -7.8% | 279 m²725 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Frankenstraat 6 Heumen | € 849.000 € 799.000 | -5.9% | 170 m²447 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Broekstraat 40 Nederasselt | € 395.000 € 389.000 | -1.5% | 84 m²217 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Haydnstraat 18 Groesbeek | € 419.000 € 395.000 | -5.7% | 130 m²151 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Smaragdstraat 36 Nijmegen | € 495.000 € 450.000 | -9.1% | 97 m²135 m² | |||
01/07/2026 | Liefkeshoek 12 Katwijk (NB) | € 659.000 € 629.000 | -4.5% | 150 m²695 m² | |||
29/06/2026 | Einsteinstraat 40 Nijmegen | € 550.000 € 495.000 | -10.0% | 130 m²166 m² | |||
28/06/2026 | Kasteellaan 59 Wijchen | € 1.150.000 € 1.095.000 | -4.8% | 238 m²382 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kling 54
Apartment at Kling 54 in Cuijk (Cuijk Heeswijkse Kampen neighbourhood). The home was built in 2013 and has 96 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Cuijk (2.2 km). The nearest primary school is Basissch De Waai (666 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted13 Jul 2026€ 379,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 399,000
Property details
- Living area
- 96 m²
- Construction year
- 2013
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 401,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Cuijk Heeswijkse Kampen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- Multiple within 1 km3
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High5.1%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby7
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away16.7 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place10.53 ratio
- Buildings under construction in the neighbourhoodⓘ
- intensive building activity18 buildings
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot1,012 m²
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Many solar panels55%
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)145 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical750 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values8.1%
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.543 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away27.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 construction plan within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 499 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
22nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 258 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
72nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
79th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 144 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
32nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 239 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 144 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 127 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 73 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 92 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
60th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 230 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 54 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.