Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Laan van Wateringse Veld 1066
Apartment at Laan van Wateringse Veld 1066 in 's-Gravenhage (Lage Veld neighbourhood). The home was built in 2000 and has 88 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (2.5 km). The nearest primary school is De Gantel (410 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted13 Jun 2026€ 425,000−€ 14,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 439,000
Property details
- Living area
- 88 m²
- Construction year
- 2000
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 365,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lage Veld, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Noise loadⓘ
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away7.3 km
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot3,280 m²
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average27%
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)139 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical710 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.944 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 11% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 350 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
70th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 104 pupils · total 807 pupils
Disadvantage score 112 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 488 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 1% of schools
96th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 34% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 722 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.