Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Looiershof 47
Apartment at Looiershof 47 in Rotterdam (Delfshaven neighbourhood). The home was built in 1909 and has 133 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Coolhaven (621 m). The nearest primary school is Delfshaven (185 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jun 2026€ 625,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 675,000
Property details
- Living area
- 133 m²
- Construction year
- 1909
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 648,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Delfshaven, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Capacity nearest WWTPⓘ
- Very large treatment plant423,000 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby22
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby14
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own streetⓘ
- Very busy (main/motorway)13,500 per day
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside26.2%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors27.2%
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot2,878 m²
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)115 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical560 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.133 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away21.8 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)25.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 19 construction plans within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 740 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
11th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
36th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 150 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
40th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
97th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 108 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO
61st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.