Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
-0.1%
-8.3%
-11.1%
-5.1%
-7.1%
-6.7%
-1.5%
-7.1%
-6.5%
-1.2%
-7.1%
-3.5%
-4.6%
-4.8%
-2.6%
-6.5%
-6.8%
-6.1%
-9.1%
-2.6%
-2.8%
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Marco Polostraat 91 3
Apartment at Marco Polostraat 91 in Amsterdam (Columbusplein e.o. neighbourhood). The home was built in 1929 and has 56 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool de Visserschool (113 m).
Know first, then bid.
Price & status history
- Under offer7 days ago
- Relisted11 Jul 2026€ 525,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Features
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
58 permits within 500 m · 3 construction plans within 1 km · 48 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
91st percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 28% of schools
13th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 60: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
66th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 391 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
86th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 286 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 351 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
34th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 62% of schools
56th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
75th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 52% of schools
10th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
18th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
0th percentile: low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
1st percentile: low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
35th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.