Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Maria Beshof 42
Apartment at Maria Beshof 42 in Amsterdam (Jacob Geelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2024 and has 50 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Postjesweg (329 m). The nearest primary school is Brede School Huizinga (159 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer15 Jul 2026
- Relisted4 Jul 2026€ 400,000−€ 35,000
- Under offer22 Jun 2026
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 435,000
Property details
- Living area
- 50 m²
- Construction year
- 2024
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 395,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Jacob Geelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance11.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors32.3%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty11.6%
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,455 m²
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy114%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average26%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions7 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)-12 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical430 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 40 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 489 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 71 pupils · total 533 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
34th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 38 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.