Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Marie van Eijsden-Vinkstraat 389
Apartment at Marie van Eijsden-Vinkstraat 389 in Rotterdam (Prinsenland neighbourhood). The home was built in 1995 and has 163 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Schenkel (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is De Kleine Prins (411 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced30 Jun 2026€ 690,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 725,000
Property details
- Living area
- 163 m²
- Construction year
- 1995
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 654,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Prinsenland, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.2 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.28 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share20.6%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot592 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical530 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.914 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away18.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 28 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 88 pupils · total 685 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 614 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
no recent test score · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 117 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.