Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Marnixstraat 315 D
Apartment at Marnixstraat 315 in Amsterdam (Marnixbuurt-Midden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1886 and has 67 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Rokin (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool Dr Rijk Kramer (147 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 550,000−€ 45,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 595,000
Property details
- Living area
- 67 m²
- Construction year
- 1886
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 581,000
- Ownership
- Property subject to leasehold (leasehold expiry: 15-09-2046)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Marnixbuurt-Midden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated165 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.126 score
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery2%
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area50
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime85 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 8.05
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.7%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure82
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity21
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.8%
- Road traffic noise
- Strong nuisance23.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors31%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby8
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Leasehold or freehold
- LeaseholdYes
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels1%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance to airport
- Nearby10.5 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.6 µg/m³
- Noise load
- Heavy62 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing54 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated7.2%
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot405 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)170 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical700 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.653 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away6.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.9 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
78 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 348 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 359 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 0% of schools
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 196 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.