Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Martini van Geffenstraat 144
Apartment at Martini van Geffenstraat 144 in Amsterdam (Osdorpplein e.o. neighbourhood). The home was built in 2002 and has 100 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Lelylaan (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is Osdorpse Montessori School (432 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted5 Jun 2026€ 475,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 500,000
Property details
- Living area
- 100 m²
- Construction year
- 2002
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 556,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Osdorpplein e.o., compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.9 km
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area21
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,775 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical280 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.695 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 314 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 418 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
34th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
44th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 352 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.