Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Mathenesserdijk 308 B
Home at Mathenesserdijk 308 in Rotterdam (Tussendijken neighbourhood). The home has 58 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Delfshaven (346 m). The nearest primary school is Valentijn (210 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced14 Jul 2026€ 300,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale10 Jun 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 58 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 258,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Tussendijken, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.9 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby24
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby15
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside27.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors29.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space80 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical610 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,639 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.26 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away22.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
22 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 150 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
36th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 501 pupils
Disadvantage score 166 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
11th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
40th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 102 pupils · total 864 pupils
Disadvantage score 156 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
97th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
48th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.