Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Mathenesserweg 155 B02
Home at Mathenesserweg 155 in Rotterdam (Spangen neighbourhood). The home has 107 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Marconiplein (208 m). The nearest primary school is Nicolaas (178 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted25 Jun 2026€ 325,000−€ 34,500
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 359,500
Property details
- Living area
- 107 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 326,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Spangen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.8 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby13
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot697 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space113 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,935 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.342 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away23.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 102 pupils · total 864 pupils
Disadvantage score 156 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 291 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 150 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
11th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
65th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
1st percentile — low · 65% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.