Price drops in and around Landgraaf
More homes in and around Landgraaf whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Moltweg 52
Semi-detached at Moltweg 52 in Landgraaf (Kakert neighbourhood). The home was built in 1954 and has 254 m² of living space, a 328 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Landgraaf (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is OBS Wereldwijs (872 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced8 Jul 2026€ 319,000−€ 5,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 324,000
Property details
- Living area
- 254 m²
- Plot
- 328 m²
- Construction year
- 1954
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 340,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kakert, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)375 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorF
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.6%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot149 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels42%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space207 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential14,237 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,017 kWh/kWp/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 295,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.3%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
62nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
42nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 287 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
60th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 94 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
46th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 276 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
40th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
78th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
24th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 278 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO · 19 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
100th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VBO · 33 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 119 exam candidates
94th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.