Price drops in and around Leidschendam
More homes in and around Leidschendam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Filmlaan 1 Zoetermeer | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 115 m²129 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Breestraat 123 B Leiden | € 699.000 € 625.000 | -10.6% | 109 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schuitwater 17 Zoetermeer | € 475.000 € 469.000 | -1.3% | 132 m²153 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Neherpark 134
Apartment at Neherpark 134 in Leidschendam (Verzetsheldenwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 95 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Leidschendam-Voorburg (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Roomskatholieke Basisschool Maria Bernadette (163 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted13 Jun 2026€ 575,000−€ 60,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 635,000
Property details
- Living area
- 95 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 493,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Verzetsheldenwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Soil standard exceededⓘ
- Standard exceededYes
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress49 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Environmental health risk (MGR)ⓘ
- High environmental health risk9.6%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away6.3 km
- Distance to business districtⓘ
- Adjacent to business park22 m
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure18
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot17,877 m²
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average40%
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)117 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values8.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.822 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away38.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
16 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
78th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 258 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
54th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 214 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 25% of schools
67th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 68 pupils · total 556 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
4th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 250 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 455 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 337 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 123 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 50 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 146 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 110 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
12th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
84th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 65 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.