Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Orteliuskade 49 H
Apartment at Orteliuskade 49 in Amsterdam (Orteliusbuurt-Midden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1940 and has 80 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool de Visserschool (417 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)1 Jul 2026
- Relisted15 Jun 2026€ 800,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 850,000
Property details
- Living area
- 80 m²
- Construction year
- 1940
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 835,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Orteliusbuurt-Midden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby21
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.4%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated145 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1573 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)141 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical600 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.645 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
38 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 47 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 391 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
34th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
86th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 286 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 351 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.