Price drops in and around Hilversum
More homes in and around Hilversum whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Oude Amersfoortseweg 245
Apartment at Oude Amersfoortseweg 245 in Hilversum (Van Riebeeckkwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1952 and has 64 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Hilversum Sportpark (651 m). The nearest primary school is De Windkanter (200 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced9 Jun 2026€ 325,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 64 m²
- Construction year
- 1952
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 293,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Van Riebeeckkwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to railway line
- Very close to railway54 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.8%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.9%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity41
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,398 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)190 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical720 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values7.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.489 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 41 construction plans within 500 m · 27 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
33rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
57th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
48th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 158 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
49th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 368 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 403 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 12% of schools
92nd percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 464 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 361 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
97th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 442 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 140 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
93rd percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 28 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 74 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
45th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 264 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
28th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 106 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 31 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 55 exam candidates
79th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 105 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.