Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Palestrinastraat 29 1
Apartment at Palestrinastraat 29 in Amsterdam (Concertgebouwbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1903 and has 159 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is De Pijp (1 km). The nearest primary school is Hildebrand Van Loonschool (199 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 1,285,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,320,000
Property details
- Living area
- 159 m²
- Construction year
- 1903
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 1,284,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Concertgebouwbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated145 persons
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime143.5 per 1,000 residents
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure106
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity21
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby6
- Asbestos-suspected roof area
- Large suspected asbestos roof area36.7 m²
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels3%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)24 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby9.3 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- High flight nuisance13%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.5 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.87 µg/kg
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)137 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.666 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away7.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)5.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
103 permits · 6 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 360 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 147 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 17% of schools
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
86th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 405 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 299 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
97th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 224 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 259 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 240 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 196 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VWO · 105 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
16th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 173 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 186 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 74 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.