Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Piet van de Polsingel 161
Terraced house at Piet van de Polsingel 161 in Rotterdam (Terbregge neighbourhood). The home was built in 2000 and has 136 m² of living space, a 142 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Binnenhof (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Heybergschool Molenwiek (535 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 600,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 650,000
Property details
- Living area
- 136 m²
- Plot
- 142 m²
- Construction year
- 2000
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 608,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold end date: 30-11-2097)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Terbregge, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.8 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.78 ratio
- Child-friendliness (score)
- Little child-friendly40 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average32%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space52 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical640 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,159 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield995 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 26 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
69th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 268 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 373 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 69 pupils · total 628 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 195 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 108 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
40th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 475 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 67 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
78th percentile — high · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.