Price drops in and around Amstelveen
More homes in and around Amstelveen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Ringslang 79
Apartment at Ringslang 79 in Amstelveen (Bovenkerk neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 90 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Schiphol Airport (5 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool de Westwijzer (184 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted1 Jul 2026€ 599,000−€ 30,500
- Relisted11 Jun 2026€ 629,500−€ 15,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 645,000
Property details
- Living area
- 90 m²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 496,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bovenkerk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Well above national average€ 615,000
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.9 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- Severe flight nuisance20.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.8%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)254,986 m²
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby25.5 ha
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot705 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average30%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions16 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)84 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.636 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
90th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 104 pupils · total 706 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 79 pupils · total 486 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 395 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 12% of schools
95th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 642 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
25th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 298 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
57th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
47th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 120 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 45 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 112 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.