Price drops in and around Terneuzen
More homes in and around Terneuzen whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28/07/2026 | Scheldekade 58 d Terneuzen | β¬ 549.500 β¬ 529.000 | -3.7% | 113 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Stationsstraat 1 Oudelande | β¬ 580.000 β¬ 570.000 | -1.7% | 130 mΒ²870 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Rapenburg 106 A Vogelwaarde | β¬ 395.000 β¬ 375.000 | -5.1% | 178 mΒ²433 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Bijlokeplein 22 Axel | β¬ 199.500 β¬ 196.500 | -1.5% | 75 mΒ²131 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Kasteelstraat 30 Philippine | β¬ 489.000 β¬ 396.000 | -19.0% | 92 mΒ²1623 mΒ² | |||
25/07/2026 | Mosselbank 9 Philippine | β¬ 529.000 β¬ 499.000 | -5.7% | 172 mΒ²629 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Gouwestraat 12 Terneuzen | β¬ 330.000 β¬ 329.500 | -0.1% | 123 mΒ²168 mΒ² | |||
22/07/2026 | dr. Buijzestraat 40 Terneuzen | β¬ 279.000 β¬ 249.000 | -10.8% | 92 mΒ² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kokmeeuw kavel 996A Terneuzen | β¬ 160.000 β¬ 130.000 | -18.8% | β | |||
20/07/2026 | Stuvesande 384 Terneuzen | β¬ 359.000 β¬ 349.000 | -2.8% | 89 mΒ² | |||
20/07/2026 | Stationsstraat 1 Oudelande | β¬ 599.000 β¬ 580.000 | -3.2% | 130 mΒ²870 mΒ² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drostlaan 8 a Sluiskil | β¬ 265.000 β¬ 250.000 | -5.7% | 125 mΒ²271 mΒ² | |||
17/07/2026 | Keijzerstraat 16 Hoek | β¬ 275.000 β¬ 269.500 | -2.0% | 124 mΒ²483 mΒ² | |||
15/07/2026 | Dorpspad 1 Vogelwaarde | β¬ 440.000 β¬ 389.000 | -11.6% | 77 mΒ² | |||
14/07/2026 | Bankertstraat 4 Axel | β¬ 385.000 β¬ 375.000 | -2.6% | 121 mΒ²262 mΒ² | |||
14/07/2026 | Fahrenheitlaan 420 Terneuzen | β¬ 330.000 β¬ 315.000 | -4.5% | 96 mΒ² | |||
10/07/2026 | Axelsestraat 52 a Terneuzen | β¬ 249.000 β¬ 239.000 | -4.0% | 85 mΒ²140 mΒ² | |||
09/07/2026 | Waterfront 360 Terneuzen | β¬ 425.000 β¬ 417.500 | -1.8% | 120 mΒ² | |||
08/07/2026 | Poststraat 4 Philippine | β¬ 199.500 β¬ 185.000 | -7.3% | 72 mΒ²59 mΒ² | |||
07/07/2026 | Scheldekade 21 Terneuzen | β¬ 425.000 β¬ 398.000 | -6.3% | 107 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Scheldekade 58 d
Apartment at Scheldekade 58 in Terneuzen (Binnenstad-Java neighbourhood). The home was built in 2023 and has 114 mΒ² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Baarland (9.3 km). The nearest primary school is Prins Willem van Oranjeschool (1.3 km).
Price & status history
- Price reduced28 Jul 2026β¬ 529,000ββ¬ 20,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 549,500
Property details
- Living area
- 114 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 2023
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- β¬ 507,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Binnenstad-Java, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyβ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1016 score
- Net labour participationβ
- Low55%
- Distance to attractionβ
- Far away30.2 km
- Distance to interchange stationβ
- Far away39.7 km
- Distance to train stationβ
- Station very far away35.8 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)β
- Many children per place3 ratio
- Child-friendliness (score)β
- Little child-friendly36 score
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsβ
- High crime111.6 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.8%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.4%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)β
- Much building pressure6
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)β
- High4.9%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)β
- High5.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress46 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)β
- Above the standardYes
- Foundation riskβ
- High risklarge
- Shared plotβ
- Shared plotYes
- Within Wbb soil locationβ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeβ
- Below the national average48.4%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyβ
- Below the national average52.3%
- Share of social assistance recipientsβ
- Elevated5.8%
- Proportion of flexible employment contractsβ
- Much flexible work41.2%Β· NL 27%
- Share of highly educated residentsβ
- Low education13.1%Β· NL 37%
- Share of households lowest 40% incomeβ
- above-average many low incomes63.9%
- Share of persons in povertyβ
- Above average7.4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential designationresidential
- Plot area (cadastral plot)β
- Very generous plot1,165 mΒ²
- Calculated COβ emissionsβ
- Low emissions6 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Efficient (label A/B)24 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- EconomicalA+++
- Average WOZ value (municipality)β
- Far below national average⬠279,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)β
- Rising property values9%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOββ
- Very low0.924 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityβ
- Far away48.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits Β· 1 construction plan within 500 m Β· 5 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
36th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 44 pupils Β· total 414 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
6th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 20 pupils Β· total 118 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
60th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 11 pupils Β· total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 54% of schools
26th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 29 pupils Β· total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 72% of schools
82nd percentile: high Β· DIA Β· grade 8: 37 pupils Β· total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
64th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 22 pupils Β· total 193 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile: average Β· ROUTE 8 Β· grade 8: 16 pupils Β· total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
36th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 188 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 49 pupils Β· total 309 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
25th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 17 pupils Β· total 158 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 40% of schools
74th percentile: average Β· 95% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 190 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
no exam results Β· PRO
50th percentile: average Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 218 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO
no exam results Β· VBO
no exam results Β· VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.