Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Slotermeerlaan 43
Apartment at Slotermeerlaan 43 in Amsterdam (Lodewijk van Deysselbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1956 and has 75 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Burgemeester De Vlugtschool (329 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced30 Jun 2026€ 399,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 75 m²
- Construction year
- 1956
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 391,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lodewijk van Deysselbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions3,393 kg/m2/yr
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance12.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby29
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors29.1%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental89%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated95 persons
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,010 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical680 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.638 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.5 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.2 km
- Distance to railway line
- Far from rail1.2 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away5,519 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits within 500 m · 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 117 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 93 pupils · total 591 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 375 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 174 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
no exam results · PRO
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.