Price drops in and around Vlaardingen
More homes in and around Vlaardingen whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Vlaardingen, averaging −5.1%. The biggest cut was € 100.000 (Overschiese Dorpsstraat 53, Rotterdam). Last updated 16 September.
All houses dropping in price in Vlaardingen →House prices and market figures in Vlaardingen →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Thomas à Kempisstraat 116
Apartment at Thomas à Kempisstraat 116 in Vlaardingen (Hoogkamer neighbourhood). The home was built in 1962 and has 100 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Vlaardingen West (443 m). The nearest primary school is Prins Willem Alexandersch (319 m).
estimate€ 425,000
overbidding€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Price reducedtoday€ 325,000−€ 14,000
- Listed for sale30 May 2026€ 339,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 33.6% With children+2.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 43.2% Single-person+3.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 23.2% Other multi-person−5.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 47% Owner-occupied−10 pt vs the Netherlands
- 38% Social housing+10 pt vs the Netherlands
- 15% Private rental+1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 47% Dutch background−25.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 17.3% Rest of Europe+8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 35.8% Outside Europe+17.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 37.5% Lower+11.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 52.2% Intermediate+11.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 10.4% Higher−22.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Hoogkamer neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
135 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 25% Theft / burglary−14 pt vs the Netherlands
- 34.1% Othersame as the Netherlands
- 19.7% Violence and threats+9.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 17.4% Vandalism+8.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 3.8% Public order−4.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: grossly inadequate
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
26 permits within 500 m · 59 construction plans within 1 km · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 505 pupils
Disadvantage score 108: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
3rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
60th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 89 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 16% of schools
no recent test score · total 108 pupils
Disadvantage score 14: more disadvantage than 49% of schools
8th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
28th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 108: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
34th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 246 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
8th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 380 pupils
Disadvantage score 32: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 132 pupils
Disadvantage score 49: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
51st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 79 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 92: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
60th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
86th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
29th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 182 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 243 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
8th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 148 exam candidates
85th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 31 exam candidates
7th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 62 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

