Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Thomas Mannsingel 18 A
Apartment at Thomas Mannsingel 18 in 's-Gravenhage (Kraayenstein en Vroondaal neighbourhood). The home was built in 2024 and has 70 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (5.3 km). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum Vroondaal (1.3 km).
Price & status history
- Under offer8 Jul 2026
- Relisted11 Jun 2026€ 465,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 495,000
Property details
- Living area
- 70 m²
- Construction year
- 2024
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- —
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kraayenstein en Vroondaal, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticultureⓘ
- Very close219 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 kmⓘ
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)801,113 m²
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Greenhouse area within 1 kmⓘ
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby39.11 ha
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away8.5 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place5.53 ratio
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot2,807 m²
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average40%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions10 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)41 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA+++
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical680 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.819 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits · 6 construction plans within 500 m · 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 692 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 462 pupils
Disadvantage score 149 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
67th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 462 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
25th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 111 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 224 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
63rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.