Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van Bossepad 3
Terraced house at Van Bossepad 3 in Amsterdam (Buyskade e.o. neighbourhood). The home was built in 2020 and has 163 m² of living space, a 126 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rokin (1.9 km). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool De Catamaran (399 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced2 Jul 2026€ 1,350,000−€ 100,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 163 m²
- Plot
- 126 m²
- Construction year
- 2020
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 1,446,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Buyskade e.o., compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions3,850 kg/m2/yr
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby25
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors40.3%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park50 m
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space89 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical610 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,175 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
29 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 0% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
56th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.