Price drops in and around Purmerend
More homes in and around Purmerend whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van IJsendijkstraat 134
Semi-detached at Van IJsendijkstraat 134 in Purmerend (Overwhere-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1962 and has 157 m² of living space, a 538 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Purmerend Overwhere (405 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool 't Prisma (533 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted19 Jun 2026€ 650,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 675,000
Property details
- Living area
- 157 m²
- Plot
- 538 m²
- Construction year
- 1962
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 650,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Overwhere-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away15.8 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.85 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share18.6%
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land29%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot255 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average36%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space117 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical500 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential8,308 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
22nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 302 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
67th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 392 pupils
Disadvantage score 83 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
78th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 345 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 392 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 135 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 52 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 13% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 286 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
38th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 102 exam candidates
67th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 75 exam candidates
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 8 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 117 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · HAVO/VWO · 209 exam candidates
90th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 190 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/PRO
96th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 163 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.