Price drops in and around Schiedam
More homes in and around Schiedam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oosterlee 6 De Lier | € 450.000 € 425.000 | -5.6% | 107 m²140 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Statenweg 182 B Rotterdam | € 525.000 € 499.000 | -5.0% | 123 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Donkerslootstraat 143 B Rotterdam | € 290.000 € 269.500 | -7.1% | 93 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 82 A Rotterdam | € 275.000 € 249.500 | -9.3% | 48 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Burgemeester Van Haarenlaan 1324 Schiedam | € 290.000 € 275.000 | -5.2% | 71 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Waghenaerdreef 38 Bergschenhoek | € 650.000 € 645.000 | -0.8% | 138 m²170 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Looiershof 48 Rotterdam | € 550.000 € 500.000 | -9.1% | 137 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van Maanenstraat 31
Semi-detached at Van Maanenstraat 31 in Schiedam (Staatsliedenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2009 and has 195 m² of living space, a 107 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Parkweg (490 m). The nearest primary school is Het Startblok (231 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted12 Jun 2026€ 775,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 795,000
Property details
- Living area
- 195 m²
- Plot
- 107 m²
- Construction year
- 2009
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 686,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property subject to leasehold (leasehold end date: 01-05-2106)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Staatsliedenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Very close to railway68 m
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Directly next to airport4.6 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance9.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space65 m²
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical570 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,578 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,007 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values10.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 486 pupils
Disadvantage score 135 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
44th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 576 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
32nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 370 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 30% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
19th percentile — low · DOE · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 250 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
28th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
20th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VWO · 78 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
28th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 75 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.