Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Frans Bekkerstraat 82 A
Apartment at Frans Bekkerstraat 82 in Rotterdam (Oud Charlois neighbourhood). The home was built in 1955 and has 49 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Zuidplein (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is Charlois (216 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted15 Jul 2026€ 249,500−€ 25,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 275,000
Property details
- Living area
- 49 m²
- Construction year
- 1955
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 240,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud Charlois, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km4
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant423,000 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot437 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.114 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away20.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)23.8 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.5 km
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Far away (>250 m)1.1 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away2,880 m
- Distance to nearest high-voltage power line
- Far from high voltage1.4 km
- Distance to nearest greenhouse
- No greenhouse in the vicinity (>2 km)5.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 81 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
47th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 279 pupils
Disadvantage score 67 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 285 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
38th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 81 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
26th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 351 pupils
Disadvantage score 91 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 301 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 344 pupils
Disadvantage score 80 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
12th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO
61st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 108 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 148 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.