Price drops in and around Amersfoort
More homes in and around Amersfoort whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24/07/2026 | Eemlaan 1 Amersfoort | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 60 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van Randwijcklaan 99 B Amersfoort | € 369.000 € 297.500 | -19.4% | 72 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Prins Hendrikstraat 10 Woudenberg | € 499.500 € 470.000 | -5.9% | 118 m²178 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Burgemeester de Kortesingel 23 Scherpenzeel (GE) | € 750.000 € 725.000 | -3.3% | 149 m²325 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Meerval 20 Amersfoort | € 465.000 € 450.000 | -3.2% | 117 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Binnen de Veste 42 Amersfoort | € 385.000 € 350.000 | -9.1% | 67 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Croessrak 2 Leusden | € 550.000 € 529.000 | -3.8% | 125 m²138 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Gele Plomp 16 Amersfoort | € 515.000 € 499.000 | -3.1% | 139 m²147 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Havendijk 17 Bunschoten-Spakenburg | € 499.000 € 485.000 | -2.8% | 93 m²59 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zuiderzeeboulevard 61 Bunschoten-Spakenburg | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 140 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Rembrandt van Rijnstraat 7 Bunschoten-Spakenburg | € 597.000 € 579.000 | -3.0% | 132 m²195 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Saloméstraat 14 Amersfoort | € 595.000 € 565.000 | -5.0% | 103 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Straat van Corsica 145 Amersfoort | € 495.000 € 479.000 | -3.2% | 110 m²102 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Achter de Arnhemse Poortwal 9 Amersfoort | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 101 m²75 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | De Steenuil 23 Amersfoort | € 405.000 € 399.000 | -1.5% | 67 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Kritzingerlaan 61 Zeist | € 1.065.000 € 945.000 | -11.3% | 211 m²492 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nieuwstraat 30 Baarn | € 300.000 € 285.000 | -5.0% | 47 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Marktstraat 16 b Scherpenzeel (GE) | € 500.000 € 475.000 | -5.0% | 118 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Emmalaan 6 B Baarn | € 2.300.000 € 2.095.000 | -8.9% | 512 m²1996 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Baak van Scheveningen 49 Amersfoort | € 685.000 € 615.000 | -10.2% | 110 m²106 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van Randwijcklaan 99 B
Apartment at Van Randwijcklaan 99 in Amersfoort (Kruiskamp-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1966 and has 72 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Amersfoort Schothorst (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is ikc Vlinderslag (545 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 297,500−€ 71,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 369,000
Property details
- Living area
- 72 m²
- Construction year
- 1966
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 330,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kruiskamp-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Hospitality within 25 mⓘ
- Hospitality within 25 m2
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)73.4%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure26
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity10
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby6
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside35.3%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors40.3%
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater23 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.98 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Small plot93 m²
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 504,000
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance8%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10 µg/m³
- Road traffic noiseⓘ
- Considerable noise15.9%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- Elevated1.1%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facilityⓘ
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)170 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical550 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values13%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.47 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away46.3 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)11.4 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood350 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
24 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 47 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
45th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
15th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
15th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 257 pupils
Disadvantage score 92: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
61st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 410 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 289 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 116 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 29% of schools
38th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 256 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
41st percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
16th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 169 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
32nd percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
41st percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 139 exam candidates
29th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 58 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.