Price drops in and around Halsteren
More homes in and around Halsteren whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 31 price cuts in and around Halsteren, averaging −5.1%. The biggest cut was € 141.000 (Schorrenkruid 71, Bergen op Zoom). Last updated 16 September.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
For sale-6.7%
For sale-4.3%
For sale-4.1%
For sale-5.3%
For sale-2.3%
For sale-2.8%
For sale-3.9%
For sale-2.7%
For sale-4.1%
For sale-6.5%
Sold (conditional)-4.3%
For sale-4.0%
For sale-11.1%
For sale-5.3%
For sale-4.3%
For sale-6.4%
Under offer-4.4%
For sale-10.1%
For sale-7.5%
For sale-7.8%
For sale-4.3%
For sale-3.5%
For sale-8.4%
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionIndicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Waterstraat 56
Semi-detached at Waterstraat 56 in Halsteren (De Beek neighbourhood). The home was built in 1966 and has 121 m² of living space, a 341 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Bergen op Zoom (4.8 km). The nearest primary school is Christelijke Basisschool De Springplank (300 m).
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Price reduced3 days ago€ 469,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale21 Jul 2026€ 495,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 30.8% With childrensame as the Netherlands
- 29.3% Single-person−10.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 39.9% Other multi-person+11.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 77% Owner-occupied+20 pt vs the Netherlands
- 19% Social housing−9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 4% Private rental−10 pt vs the Netherlands
- 88.2% Dutch background+16.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 5.5% Rest of Europe−3.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 6.2% Outside Europe−12.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 25.7% Lowersame as the Netherlands
- 48% Intermediate+7.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 26.3% Higher−7 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the De Beek neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
53 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 40% Theft / burglary+1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 30% Other−3.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8% Violence and threats−2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 22% Vandalism+12.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: good
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
33 permits within 500 m · 83 construction plans within 1 km · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
78th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 148 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 18% of schools
25th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 93 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 36% of schools
24th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 127 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 239 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
22nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 79 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 29% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 160 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 90 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 39% of schools
46th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 306 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 217 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
9th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
74th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 25 exam candidates
98th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO · 44 exam candidates
33rd percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
10th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VWO · 49 exam candidates
24th percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 428 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
8th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.