Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Willem Augustinstraat 131
Apartment at Willem Augustinstraat 131 in Amsterdam (Laan van Spartaan neighbourhood). The home was built in 2013 and has 97 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (397 m). The nearest primary school is Bos en Lommerschool (419 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 600,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 650,000
Property details
- Living area
- 97 m²
- Construction year
- 2013
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 668,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Laan van Spartaan, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Strong rail nuisance4.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby30
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.7%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated300 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1181 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1341 score
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot6,429 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.656 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.5 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 43 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.