Price drops in and around Hilversum
More homes in and around Hilversum whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Willem Barentszweg 148
Apartment at Willem Barentszweg 148 in Hilversum (Van Riebeeckkwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1973 and has 113 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Hilversum Sportpark (576 m). The nearest primary school is KinderCampus Hilversum (223 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted11 Jun 2026€ 475,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 500,000
Property details
- Living area
- 113 m²
- Construction year
- 1973
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 384,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Van Riebeeckkwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.8%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.9%
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,232 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical720 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values7.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.478 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away34.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)15.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
14 permits · 11 construction plans within 500 m · 25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
57th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
33rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 464 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
48th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 158 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 368 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
97th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 442 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 403 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 12% of schools
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 361 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 722 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 28 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 74 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
45th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 264 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
28th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 106 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 31 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 55 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 129 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.