Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Willem Molenbroekplein 7
Apartment at Willem Molenbroekplein 7 in Rotterdam (Kop van Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 2002 and has 87 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Wilhelminaplein (359 m). The nearest primary school is De Pijler (181 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 399,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 87 m²
- Construction year
- 2002
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 421,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold end date: 06-07-2099)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kop van Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,840 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions12 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)58 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical10 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.016 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away19.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)24.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 82 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 105 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.