Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Wolterbeekstraat 50
Apartment at Wolterbeekstraat 50 in 's-Gravenhage (Huygenspark neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 89 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag HS (261 m). The nearest primary school is Pr Ireneschool voor Christelijk Basisonderwijs (303 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced5 Jun 2026€ 425,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 89 m²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 390,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Huygenspark, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.9%
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Strong rail nuisance6.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.6 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot278 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)129 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical530 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.897 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
18 permits within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
20th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 98 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 108 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 74 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
24th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 72 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.