Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zeeburgerkade 48
Apartment at Zeeburgerkade 48 in Amsterdam (Architectenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1905 and has 100 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Muiderpoort (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Montessorischool Op de Kade (183 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted3 Jul 2026€ 650,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 700,000
Property details
- Living area
- 100 m²
- Construction year
- 1905
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 737,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold end date: 31-03-2040)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Architectenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41.9%
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery5%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)88%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure21
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,617 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical600 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.556 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away10.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)7.2 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
20 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 47 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
57th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
69th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 404 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 80 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
49th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 346 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
79th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 421 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 18% of schools
34th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 309 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 176 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/PRO
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO · 64 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 102 exam candidates
84th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 154 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/PRO · 20 exam candidates
86th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 59 exam candidates
17th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 101 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 77% passed · CE avg 6.0 · HAVO/VWO · 64 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.