Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zuiderhagen 31
Terraced house at Zuiderhagen 31 in Rotterdam (Groot IJsselmonde neighbourhood). The home was built in 1966 and has 114 m² of living space, a 149 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Lombardijen (2 km). The nearest primary school is Prins Willem Alexanderschool voor Basisonderwijs (364 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 435,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 114 m²
- Plot
- 149 m²
- Construction year
- 1966
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 360,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Groot IJsselmonde, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot91 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space62 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)175 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical600 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,370 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,008 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 104 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
no recent test score · total 80 pupils
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 508 pupils
Disadvantage score 177 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 294 pupils
Disadvantage score 100 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 357 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 133 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 346 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 286 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
14th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 42 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 37 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
68th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 244 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
74th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 99 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 58 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.