Price drops in and around Nijmegen
More homes in and around Nijmegen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zwanenveld 2702
Semi-detached at Zwanenveld 2702 in Nijmegen (Zwanenveld neighbourhood). The home was built in 1973 and has 95 m² of living space, a 155 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Nijmegen Dukenburg (941 m). The nearest primary school is PC Basissch Pr Maurits (168 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced7 Jul 2026€ 315,000−€ 44,000
- Listed for sale16 Jun 2026€ 359,000
Property details
- Living area
- 95 m²
- Plot
- 155 m²
- Construction year
- 1973
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 289,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zwanenveld, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby20
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside42%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.1 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.13 ratio
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot72 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space70 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,466 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Good yield980 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.1%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.598 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 150 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 223 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
40th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 74 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 386 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
42nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 160 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
65th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 127 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 122 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 214 exam candidates
69th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 113 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 54 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 279 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 245 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/HAVO/VWO · 183 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.