Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Anderiesenstraat 2
Terraced house at Anderiesenstraat 2 in Amsterdam (Van Tijenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 140 m² of living space, a 77 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (2.4 km). The nearest primary school is Goeman Borgesiusschool (347 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted4 Jul 2026€ 650,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 685,000
Property details
- Living area
- 140 m²
- Plot
- 77 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 597,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold end date: 15-07-2058)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Van Tijenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby24
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.6%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Wind turbines within 3 km
- Many wind turbines nearby7
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.4 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated205 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy76%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions19 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space64 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)25 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical610 m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 28 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 93 pupils · total 591 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 375 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
25th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 440 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 117 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 314 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
no exam results · PRO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.