Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Knokkestraat 65 Amsterdam | € 619.100 € 619.000 | -0.0% | 125 m²62 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Parosstraat 6 Amsterdam | € 1.695.000 € 1.495.000 | -11.8% | 258 m²385 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Willem de Zwijgerlaan 334 C14 Amsterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 51 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Banne Buikslootlaan 125 Amsterdam | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 61 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oeverpad 191 Amsterdam | € 585.000 € 550.000 | -6.0% | 122 m² | |||
19/07/2026 | Paulus Potterstraat 24 A Amsterdam | € 4.000.000 € 3.950.000 | -1.3% | 238 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Cornelis Vermuydenstraat 92 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 65 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Surinameplein 10 H Amsterdam | € 1.265.000 € 1.095.000 | -13.4% | 171 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Sibogastraat 93 Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 450.000 | -10.0% | 63 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Tweede Boerhaavestraat 70 1 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 62 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Kloveniersburgwal 99 F Amsterdam | € 695.000 € 675.000 | -2.9% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Ceintuurbaan 167 3 Amsterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.245.000 | -0.4% | 149 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Olof Palmeplein 55 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 76 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leerdamhof 7 Amsterdam | € 450.000 € 375.000 | -16.7% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Egelantiersstraat 122 D Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 485.000 | -3.0% | 62 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Durgerdammerdijk 173 Amsterdam | € 3.800.000 € 3.500.000 | -7.9% | 439 m²12680 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Middenweg 402 Amsterdam | € 675.000 € 625.000 | -7.4% | 95 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Vesuvius 26 Amstelveen | € 350.000 € 325.000 | -7.1% | 56 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korte Geuzenstraat 700 Amsterdam | € 110.000 € 107.500 | -2.3% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Witsenstraat 2 D Amsterdam | € 599.000 € 575.000 | -4.0% | 50 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
August Vermeylenstraat 48
Semi-detached at August Vermeylenstraat 48 in Amsterdam (Noordoever Sloterplas neighbourhood). The home was built in 1957 and has 60 m² of living space, a 96 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (135 m). The nearest primary school is Islamitische Basisschool El Kadisia (664 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 775,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 810,000
Property details
- Living area
- 60 m²
- Plot
- 96 m²
- Construction year
- 1957
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 708,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold end date: 31-03-2032)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Noordoever Sloterplas, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Very close to railway100 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby26
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside40.5%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors38.7%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)ⓘ
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated180 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1032 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space96 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical400 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential7,723 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.656 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 42 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.