Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Besterdring 173
Terraced house at Besterdring 173 in Tilburg (Theresia Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1905 and has 136 m² of living space, a 224 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (564 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Den Bijstere (96 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jul 2026€ 399,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale23 Jun 2026€ 419,000
Property details
- Living area
- 136 m²
- Plot
- 224 m²
- Construction year
- 1905
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 422,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Theresia Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1075 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1598 score
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m2
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area23
- Buildings under construction in the neighbourhood
- intensive building activity18 buildings
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)18%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.4%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.6%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)375 m
- Noise load
- Loud66 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive57 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby19
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby11
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,963.7 mol/ha/yr
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors40.5%
- Building coverage percentage
- Almost completely built up98%
- Unbuilt plot area
- Almost completely built up3 m²
- Distance to nearest emission source
- nearby299 m
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away9.9 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.1%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.7 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- Borders overburden Natura 2000 area
- Borders congested areaYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space173 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)169 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical700 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential11,995 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 12 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
18th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
90th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 36% of schools
81st percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 94 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
72nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 326 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 592 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile: high · AMN · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile: average · AMN · grade 8: 96 pupils · total 606 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 41% of schools
41st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
13th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
89th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
4th percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
17th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
46th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
23rd percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 288 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.