Price drops in and around Amersfoort
More homes in and around Amersfoort whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Binnen de Veste 42
Apartment at Binnen de Veste 42 in Amersfoort (Beestenmarkt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1983 and has 67 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Amersfoort Centraal (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is P.C. basisschool Prins Willem Alexanderschool (609 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 350,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale25 Jun 2026€ 385,000
Property details
- Living area
- 67 m²
- Construction year
- 1983
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 370,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Beestenmarkt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated200 persons
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime153.8 per 1,000 residents
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure51
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity18
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.6%
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels8%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 504,000
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise13.6%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.1%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facility
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot11,510 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical700 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.47 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away46.3 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
48 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 41 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 410 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 54% of schools
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 116 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 257 pupils
Disadvantage score 92 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
41st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 169 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
89th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 137 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
32nd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 58 exam candidates
67th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.