Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Borgerstraat 206 2
Apartment at Borgerstraat 206 in Amsterdam (Lootsbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1911 and has 43 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Postjesweg (1.9 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Het Winterkoninkje 2e Montessori-School (98 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced26 Jun 2026€ 410,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale30 May 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 43 m²
- Construction year
- 1911
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 395,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 15-06-2054)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lootsbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions3,615 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- PoorF
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby18
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical570 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.664 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away6.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)4.7 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)3.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
59 permits within 500 m · 47 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 351 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 411 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
86th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 286 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 391 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
34th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 186 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
5th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 196 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.