Price drops in and around Rosmalen
More homes in and around Rosmalen whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Bosboompad 55
Apartment at Bosboompad 55 in Rosmalen (Hintham zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 79 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is 's-Hertogenbosch Oost (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum Het IJzeren Kind (178 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026€ 479,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 499,000
Property details
- Living area
- 79 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 445,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hintham zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.1%
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.2 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.53 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.9%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.9%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km3
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources9
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.4 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 464,000
- Number of soil surveys
- Soil survey registered2
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Nearby (within area of influence)331 m
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away7.3 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.2 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources4
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot660 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions19 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)105 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.3%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.727 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away43.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)27.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
46th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 69 pupils · total 555 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 27% of schools
35th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 143 pupils
Disadvantage score 50: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 356 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 4% of schools
82nd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 242 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 592 pupils
Disadvantage score 63: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
83rd percentile: high · DIA · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
71st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 360 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
81st percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 498 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
29th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
83rd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 408 pupils
Disadvantage score 14: more disadvantage than 51% of schools
22nd percentile: low · 90% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO · 144 exam candidates
93rd percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 83 exam candidates
58th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 332 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
22nd percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 331 exam candidates
46th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 421 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 97 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 169 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.