Price drops in and around Eindhoven
More homes in and around Eindhoven whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Boschdijk 199
Apartment at Boschdijk 199 in Eindhoven (Limbeek-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1981 and has 69 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Eindhoven Stadion (610 m). The nearest primary school is Fellenoord (429 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jul 2026€ 310,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 320,000
Property details
- Living area
- 69 m²
- Construction year
- 1981
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 327,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Limbeek-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions1,560 kg/m2/yr
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated105 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1776 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1528 score
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime82.9 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)77.3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)69%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure10
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.5%
- Noise load
- Loud69 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive59 dB
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby11
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,711.2 mol/ha/yr
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside28.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors33.6%
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources12
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels8%
- Number of soil surveys
- Soil survey registered1
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)935 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby6.4 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.4 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise12.2%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facility
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,487 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical600 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.668 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away65 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)14.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 46 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
79th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 43: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 399 pupils
Disadvantage score 44: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
59th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 60: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
22nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 384 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 45% of schools
99th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
72nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
73rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
49th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 539 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
64th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 3: more disadvantage than 22% of schools
64th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 118 exam candidates
44th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
94th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
29th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 141 exam candidates
69th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 220 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.