Price drops in and around Eindhoven
More homes in and around Eindhoven whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25/07/2026 | Aquariuslaan 39 Eindhoven | € 895.000 € 850.000 | -5.0% | 219 m²550 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Schubertlaan 24 Eindhoven | € 469.000 € 415.000 | -11.5% | 117 m²145 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Adelaertstraat 37 Eindhoven | € 425.000 € 415.000 | -2.4% | 110 m²140 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Willibrorduslaan 49 Valkenswaard | € 439.000 € 395.000 | -10.0% | 121 m²220 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Kampakker 30 Eindhoven | € 29.995 € 29.500 | -1.6% | 18 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Koning Arthurlaan 2 Eindhoven | € 29.995 € 29.500 | -1.6% | 18 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Texelstraat 16 Eindhoven | € 32.500 € 31.995 | -1.6% | 21 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenhei 10 Veldhoven | € 435.000 € 420.000 | -3.5% | 99 m²171 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Willem de Zwijgerstraat 34 Eindhoven | € 700.000 € 650.000 | -7.1% | 149 m²110 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Amundsenlaan 205 Eindhoven | € 400.000 € 385.000 | -3.8% | 87 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Abdijtuinen 421 Veldhoven | € 1.125.000 € 1.075.000 | -4.4% | 237 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | De Schakel 37 Best | € 425.000 € 412.000 | -3.1% | 84 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Veldmaarschalk Montgomerylaan 308 Eindhoven | € 350.000 € 325.000 | -7.1% | 74 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Grasplant 46 Eindhoven | € 650.000 € 625.000 | -3.9% | 144 m²225 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Bovenhei 66 Veldhoven | € 550.000 € 548.000 | -0.4% | 110 m²175 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Lichttoren 334 Eindhoven | € 2.050.000 € 1.950.000 | -4.9% | 281 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Smeleweg 11 Waalre | € 475.000 € 445.000 | -6.3% | 119 m²219 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Borchmolen 64 Eindhoven | € 435.000 € 419.000 | -3.7% | 80 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Generaal Coenderslaan 59 07 Eindhoven | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 49 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Graslelie 11 Eindhoven | € 695.000 € 675.000 | -2.9% | 140 m²208 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Aquariuslaan 39
Terraced house at Aquariuslaan 39 in Eindhoven (Luytelaer neighbourhood). The home was built in 1976 and has 241 m² of living space, a 550 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Eindhoven Centraal (3.4 km). The nearest primary school is De Kimme (405 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted25 Jul 2026€ 850,000−€ 45,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 895,000
Property details
- Living area
- 241 m²
- Plot
- 550 m²
- Construction year
- 1976
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 736,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Luytelaer, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)ⓘ
- Low (bottom quarter)12%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure6
- Distance to overhead high-voltage lineⓘ
- Very close47 m
- Within indicative high-voltage magnetic field zoneⓘ
- Within magnetic field zoneYes
- Capacity nearest WWTPⓘ
- Very large treatment plant443,700 i.e.
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater0 m above sea level
- Dual designationⓘ
- Archaeological protectionValue – Archaeology 4
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Above average1,470 m³
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)80 m
- Distance to nearest high-voltage power lineⓘ
- Near high-voltage line41 m
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby9 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.5%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facilityⓘ
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Voltage level of nearest lineⓘ
- Heavier line (150 kV)150 kV
- Voltage level near high-voltage lineⓘ
- Heavier line (wider zone)150 kV
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Very spacious plot278 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Many solar panels64%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space266 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential15,902 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield994 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
12th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 222 pupils
Disadvantage score 69: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
78th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 202 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
27th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 25: more disadvantage than 65% of schools
63rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 43% of schools
85th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 324 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 97 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 36% of schools
77th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
75th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 225 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 18% of schools
40th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 358 pupils
Disadvantage score 44: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
61st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 67% of schools
7th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 83 exam candidates
74th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 295 exam candidates
37th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 229 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
44th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
91st percentile: high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
43rd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 131 exam candidates
43rd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 185 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.