Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Utrecht, averaging −6%. The biggest cut was € 550.000 (Ruigenhoeksedijk 34, Groenekan). Last updated 14 September.
All houses dropping in price in Utrecht →House prices and market figures in Utrecht →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
For sale-2.8%
For sale-9.1%
For sale-8.2%
For sale-4.8%
For sale
For sale-5.3%
For sale-8.7%
For sale-5.0%
For sale-4.1%
Under offer-4.5%
For sale-7.2%
For sale-6.9%
For sale-5.8%
For sale-3.4%
For sale-4.8%
For sale-4.0%
For sale-7.7%
For sale-3.9%
For sale-11.4%
For sale-6.3%
For sale-15.8%
For sale-5.3%
For sale-7.3%
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionIndicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Brucknerlaan 45
Terraced house at Brucknerlaan 45 in Utrecht (Welgelegen, Den Hommel neighbourhood). The home was built in 1960 and has 107 m² of living space, a 133 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is 24 Oktoberplein-Zuid (409 m). The nearest primary school is Johan de Witt (459 m).
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 695,000−€ 20,000
- Off Funda12 days ago
- Listed for sale17 Jun 2026€ 715,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 12.7% With children−18.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 62.3% Single-person+22.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 25% Other multi-person−3.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 44% Owner-occupied−13 pt vs the Netherlands
- 0% Social housing−28 pt vs the Netherlands
- 55% Private rental+41 pt vs the Netherlands
- 73.9% Dutch background+1.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 11.9% Rest of Europe+2.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 13.9% Outside Europe−4.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 15.9% Lower−10.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 22.9% Intermediate−17.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 61.2% Higher+27.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Welgelegen, Den Hommel neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
181 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 67.2% Theft / burglary+28.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 14.7% Other−18.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 5.1% Violence and threats−4.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 7.9% Vandalism−1.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 5.1% Public order−3.6 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: good
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
35 permits within 500 m · 107 construction plans within 1 km · 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
77th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 711 pupils
Disadvantage score 122: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
93rd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 309 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 254 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 28% of schools
85th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 308 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 49% of schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
40th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 247 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
92nd percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
73rd percentile: average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 160 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.6 · HAVO · 14 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
8th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.