Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Bunschotenstraat 75
Terraced house at Bunschotenstraat 75 in Tilburg (Gesworen Hoek Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1984 and has 119 m² of living space, a 183 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Tilburg Reeshof (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool voor Daltononderwijs Helen Parkhurst (142 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jul 2026€ 425,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale30 May 2026€ 435,000
Property details
- Living area
- 119 m²
- Plot
- 183 m²
- Construction year
- 1984
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 406,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Gesworen Hoek Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2526 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1231 score
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High21.3%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6 km
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)7%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.1%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79.3%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby19
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby7
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Wind turbines within 3 km
- Many wind turbines nearby7
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources9
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 km
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby6
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot182 m above sea level
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- One within 1 km1
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Nearby (within area of influence)937 m
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away7.9 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.3 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.77 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average45.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot83 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy73%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average31%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions12 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space84 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)47 kWh/m²/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
7th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
22nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 132 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 351 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 43% of schools
59th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 276 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 25% of schools
74th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 293 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
60th percentile: average · AMN · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 447 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 221 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 46 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 16% of schools
85th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 216 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
81st percentile: high · AMN · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 327 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
11th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 389 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 80 exam candidates
10th percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 65 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
46th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.