Price drops in and around Purmerend
More homes in and around Purmerend whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Burgemeester D. Kooimanweg 227
Apartment at Burgemeester D. Kooimanweg 227 in Purmerend (Overwhere-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1980 and has 62 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Purmerend Overwhere (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Klim Op (576 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted8 Jul 2026€ 275,000−€ 14,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 289,500
Property details
- Living area
- 62 m²
- Construction year
- 1980
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 296,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Overwhere-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away16.8 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated135 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.32 ratio
- Distance to nearest induced earthquake
- Earthquake very nearby1.3 km
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-12.8 mm/yr
- In area with induced earthquakes
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,275 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical650 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.428 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away16.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)11.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
78th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
67th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
22nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 302 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
83rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 486 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 129 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 52 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 13% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 286 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 392 pupils
Disadvantage score 83 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 345 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
90th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 190 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 117 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · HAVO/VWO · 209 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 102 exam candidates
67th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 75 exam candidates
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 8 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.