Price drops in and around Almere
More homes in and around Almere whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Cissy van Marxveldtstraat 65
Detached at Cissy van Marxveldtstraat 65 in Almere (Literatuurwijk Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 2001 and has 269 m² of living space, a 527 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Almere Muziekwijk (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is De Omnibus (520 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted26 Jun 2026€ 900,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 950,000
Property details
- Living area
- 269 m²
- Plot
- 527 m²
- Construction year
- 2001
- Property type
- Detached
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 945,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Literatuurwijk Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Voltage level of nearest line
- Major transmission line (220–380 kV)380 kV
- Voltage level near high-voltage line
- National transport line (widest zone)380 kV
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park40 m
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-9.2 mm/yr
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.72 m
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land30%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot366 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels55%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions15 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space261 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)74 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 1 zoning plan amendment within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 562 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
27th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 411 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 32% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 256 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 255 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 408 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 397 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · 84% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
20th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 241 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 125 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 137 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
38th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 195 exam candidates
25th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 79 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.