Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
De Liefde 14
Apartment at De Liefde 14 in Amsterdam (Da Costabuurt-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1992 and has 94 m² of living space, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Rokin (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is De Waterkant (249 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced18 Jun 2026€ 950,000−€ 45,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 995,000
Property details
- Living area
- 94 m²
- Construction year
- 1992
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 802,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Da Costabuurt-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby22
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.7%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby6
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,674 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)177 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.652 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away6.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
62 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 49 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 348 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
86th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 286 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 391 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 196 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 186 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.