Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Geerdinkhof 96
Semi-detached at Geerdinkhof 96 in Amsterdam (G-buurt-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1978 and has 130 m² of living space, a 208 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Ganzenhoef (748 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare basisschool Wereldwijs (203 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted9 Jul 2026€ 729,000−€ 21,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026€ 750,000
Property details
- Living area
- 130 m²
- Plot
- 208 m²
- Construction year
- 1978
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 638,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in G-buurt-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable14%
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- Severe flight nuisance24.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)19%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.3%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot95 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space90 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)152 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,268 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,007 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 454 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 62 pupils · total 511 pupils
Disadvantage score 168 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
52nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
4th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
25th percentile — low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 76% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.