Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Geert Grootestraat 25
Terraced house at Geert Grootestraat 25 in Amsterdam (Confuciusbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1954 and has 66 m² of living space, a 100 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (1.7 km). The nearest primary school is Pieter Jelles Troelstraschool (374 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 595,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 620,000
Property details
- Living area
- 66 m²
- Plot
- 100 m²
- Construction year
- 1954
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 508,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 15-11-2060)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Confuciusbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby24
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors33.2%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental80%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot54 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space51 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical570 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,559 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits · 17 construction plans within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 93 pupils · total 591 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 375 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 117 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
25th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 440 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
no exam results · PRO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.